
Stoney Creek condo owners ordered to remove basement renovations, pay $20,000 costs
Temporary vacant possession is available only if the owners miss the removal deadline; remediation expenses remain unresolved.
Canadian courts & legal developments
Decisions, disputes and regulatory developments from across Canada, organized around the law and the people it affects.

Temporary vacant possession is available only if the owners miss the removal deadline; remediation expenses remain unresolved.
Most recent

The Ontario ruling concerns fairness in an unfinished construction arbitration; actual bias was not alleged and the contractors’ claims remain unresolved.

Loan-default challenge belongs in provincial superior court, judge rules, leaving fairness and timeliness arguments undecided.

BC Hydro succeeds on a narrow remand after the judge finds lawyer-assisted reports reflected the expert’s own opinions.

The court rejected an all-at-once repayment proposal and preserved a further hearing before any jail commitment for missed payments.

Newly released reasons explain why an alleged undervaluation did not justify halting a firm sale of a tenanted Etobicoke property.

A temporary order allows an 11-year-old to attend school where his mother lives, while preserving his father’s parenting time and access to school information.
Jurisdiction

The Ontario ruling concerns fairness in an unfinished construction arbitration; actual bias was not alleged and the contractors’ claims remain unresolved.

The court rejected an all-at-once repayment proposal and preserved a further hearing before any jail commitment for missed payments.

Newly released reasons explain why an alleged undervaluation did not justify halting a firm sale of a tenanted Etobicoke property.

A temporary order allows an 11-year-old to attend school where his mother lives, while preserving his father’s parenting time and access to school information.
Practice & commerce

Loan-default challenge belongs in provincial superior court, judge rules, leaving fairness and timeliness arguments undecided.

AussieFit and its owner must secure potential defence costs in two cases, but the court rejected requests totalling $87,167 as unfair.

Ontario court upholds rescission and awards compensation against the franchisor and two associates, plus prejudgment interest; costs remain unresolved.

The Divisional Court found no error in a trial judge’s assessment of the parties’ conduct, communications and expense-sharing terms.
Explore
National desk