An Ontario Superior Court judge has dismissed a $50 million lawsuit1 brought by a luxury Aurora condominium corporation against its former president and several prominent developers. The lawsuit alleged the former director, Rocco A. Marcello, orchestrated the release of valuable land rights in exchange for secret real estate profits. After a lengthy trial, the court found the allegations were unproven and that Mr. Marcello had not breached his duties to the corporation.
The case centered on York Region Vacant Land Condominium Corporation No. 1010, a high end, 36 home gated community known as Adena Meadows, situated next to the Magna Golf Club. The dispute began with a large, undeveloped parcel of land that bordered the exclusive community. This adjacent land was burdened by several legal restrictions, known as easements, which were held for the benefit of the Adena Meadows condominium. These easements gave the condominium corporation significant rights over the neighbouring property.
In the fall of 2015, a deal was struck for the sale of the adjacent land. Leslie-Wellington Developments Inc., a company within the Stronach Group which originally developed the area, agreed to sell the land to Manziana Builders Corp., a company connected to developer Treasure Hill Developments Inc., for a price of $45,250,000. However, the sale was entirely conditional on the Adena Meadows condominium corporation agreeing to release its easements. Without that release, the proposed residential development could not proceed and the lucrative deal would collapse.
At the time, the condominium corporation’s board of directors consisted of three individuals: Rocco Marcello, who served as president, Mike Rogers, a senior executive with the Stronach Group, and David Coriat. The board supported the proposed development by Treasure Hill and agreed to take the necessary steps to release the easements to allow the sale to go forward. Following legal advice, the board called a special meeting of the unit owners on July 4, 2016. At that meeting, a by-law was passed authorizing the board to release the easements, paving the way for the land deal to close. The sale was completed on December 19, 2016, the easements were officially released, and the new development on the adjacent land has since been completed.
Two years later, in January 2018, the condominium corporation launched its lawsuit. The initial claim was explosive. The corporation argued that the easements it gave up were so restrictive that they made the adjacent land essentially undevelopable. It claimed the land was worth a mere $12 million with the easements in place, but skyrocketed to $43.5 million without them. The corporation alleged its former directors, Mr. Marcello and Mr. Rogers, had breached their legal duties by causing it to give away an asset worth approximately $31.5 million for no compensation. The lawsuit further alleged that Mr. Marcello had received secret interests in other real estate properties from both the seller, the Stronach Group, and the buyer, Treasure Hill, as an undisclosed reward for securing the release.
However, the case took a significant turn based on the defendants’ response. They argued the condominium corporation was, in fact, contractually obligated to release the easements all along. They pointed to provisions in several foundational legal documents, including the original easement agreements and a Shared Facilities and Services Agreement, which stated that the corporation had to release any easement “forthwith upon written request in the event that any such easement is not necessary for the proper function and operation of the Adena Meadows Condominium.”
Justice Markus Cavanagh found that at the time of the sale, the easements were indeed not necessary for the proper functioning of Adena Meadows. This meant the condominium corporation was legally required to release them upon request. This finding fundamentally undermined the corporation’s primary argument that it had given away a valuable asset for free.
Faced with this development, the condominium corporation shifted its strategy at trial. It abandoned its claim for damages based on the lost value of the easements. Instead, it advanced a new theory: that Mr. Marcello knew about these release provisions but deliberately concealed them from the seller and the buyer. The corporation argued that by hiding this information, Mr. Marcello created the false impression that his help was essential to overcome a major obstacle. This manufactured leverage, the corporation alleged, allowed him to secure personal side deals as a secret reward for his assistance.
The trial then focused intensely on these alleged secret benefits. The court examined several real estate transactions involving Mr. Marcello and his companies. One deal involved the purchase of Lot 30 in Adena Meadows, which was put in the name of his son, Michael Marcello. The court accepted Mr. Marcello’s evidence that this transaction was the result of a pre-existing 2012 joint venture agreement with Frank Stronach. Mr. Marcello had an option to purchase a different lot, Lot 28, but agreed to swap it for Lot 30 at the original 2012 price to accommodate another resident who wanted Lot 28. The court found this was unrelated to the 2016 easement release.
Another major point of contention was Lot 37, an “orphan lot” of land. Mr. Marcello had reached an agreement with Frank Stronach in March 2016 to purchase this lot at a favourable price. The corporation alleged this was a clear kickback. However, both Mr. Marcello and Mr. Stronach testified that Mr. Stronach cancelled the deal only days later, explaining he had forgotten about a prior commitment for the land. The lot was later sold to Treasure Hill’s principals. Justice Cavanagh found the testimony of Mr. Marcello and Mr. Stronach to be credible, concluding that the deal was cancelled and Mr. Marcello ultimately received no benefit from Lot 37.
The court also scrutinized a business deal where Mr. Marcello’s investment firm, Windsor Private Capital, was given an opportunity to invest in a separate Treasure Hill development in Keswick, Ontario. A new director of the condominium corporation testified that Treasure Hill’s principal, Nicholas Fidei, had told him the investment was “payback” for Mr. Marcello’s help with the easement deal. Mr. Fidei denied this in court, stating that he and Mr. Marcello had become friends and he wanted him as a business partner moving forward. The court accepted Mr. Fidei’s and Mr. Marcello’s evidence, finding it was a legitimate business investment unrelated to the Adena Meadows transaction.
Ultimately, Justice Cavanagh rejected the condominium corporation’s entire case. He found no evidence that Mr. Marcello had concealed the easement release provisions to create leverage for himself. He concluded that Mr. Marcello did not receive any secret benefits or rewards for his role in the release of the easements and, therefore, did not breach his fiduciary duties of honesty and good faith. The claims against the other director, Mike Rogers, were also dismissed. Because the court found no primary breach of duty by Mr. Marcello, the claims against the other defendants for knowingly assisting in a breach also failed.
The condominium corporation’s claim was dismissed in its entirety. A counterclaim filed by the defendants was also dismissed.
Read about more real estate cases here.
